Skip Navigation LinksHome > Solutions > Engineering > Concept Engineering
Print Page

Concept Engineering

Early planning delivers significant benefit-to-cost results.
We configure field architecture to maximize value and our ability to do so resides in the early stages of the process. As we select alternatives, we gain engineering definition and reduce uncertainty and risk.
Through feasibility studies we identify concepts and supply comparative evaluations to ease decision-making when selecting between competing scenarios for shallow and deepwater developments. Once feasibility is confirmed, we work with customers to understand their objectives, constraints and drivers to establish critical success factors for an optimum production solution to take the project into the next phase of Front End Engineering and Design (FEED).

We employ a systemic value engineering process to optimize economic value during the life of a field, by studying all project stakeholder perspectives, reviewing economic return and focusing on functional requirements rather than a preconceived configuration. This holistic approach requires a team with a broad perspective of all potential issues expected during the field’s life, from the reservoir to the point of sale. Our interface management, project experience and vertical integration with engineering, construction and installation competencies guarantee the best talent for the team.

Technology
 
 

We determine the application of new, or existing, technology which is especially critical for deepwater developments and harsh environments. We consider reservoir and site-specific factors when selecting the most suitable technology, and ultimately cost, benefit and risk determine user acceptance. Operators are often best served by working with contractors in joint industry projects or funding technology-specific studies very early in field development planning.

Studies
 
 

Concept rationalization is a circular process of many iterations, gradually converging into the answer, where we identify and develop ideas, analyze and screen options and alternatives, assess conflicts and risks to demonstrate benefits and justify our approach. We review safety, technical, commercial, environmental and operational considerations and evaluate business risk. We define a sourcing, execution and contracting strategy for each alternative, with scope definition to determine critical path, long lead items, marine spread utilization and completion date. It is imperative to understand the constructability, cost and schedule of each option, as the CAPEX/OPEX tradeoff is an important consideration for a project’s operating costs, from concept to decommissioning.

​​
Related Links
 
  • Construction Strategies for Offshore Field Development
  • FloaTEC engineering from concept to delivery
  • FloaTEC LLC. our JV company designs Floating Production Solutions